I voted in America’s ugliest presidential election

If national leadership elections were glamour contests, like the one between Justin Trudeau and Stephen Harper, there would be no winner frankfor the White House this time around. Ugly prevails south of the 49th parallel and I won’t tell you which loser I picked to plague my absentee ballot in Palm Beach County, Florida.

Yes, I had to pick somebody and there was nobody to pick.

I held my nose. I voted against the one whom I thought would do the most harm in the world. It was a close call. I could have been wrong. It’s for sure I couldn’t have been right because right isn’t a possibility in that election. Wrong was the only available choice.clinton-vs-trump-fi

The ugliest U.S. election in modern times outdoes even the sleazy scam that brought victory to the idiot king, George W. Bush, over the pretender to the invention of the Internet, Al Gore. Nobody was any damned good back then. And Toronto’s Adam Nobody, bashed by a disgraced Toronto cop at the G20 degradation in 2010, wouldn’t have been any worse a ballot choice had he contested the 2016 U.S. election.

With Bush’s brother Jeb as governor ruling my ex-home state of Florida in 2000 when Dubbya was “elected,” the fix was decidedly and manifestly in. Jeb had the power and the nature to do the obvious: Rig the vote.

My absentee ballot wasn’t counted in that election. I wasn’t alone. Thousands of other Florida voters, especially black voters, reported irregularities. Fraud, really. But even though Bush was governor, it was a shock. I couldn’t believe the blatant crookedness of that election.

My vote was counted this time, according to a report from the Palm Beach County registrar.

Does it really matter this time? How much less evil is the least-worst choice between war-monger Hillary Clinton and fame-monger The Donald? Nonetheless, I feel obliged to vote in Florida and do the research it takes to make what I hope are the best decisions.

Was The Donald’s alleged abuse of women any more or less disgraceful than Bill Clinton’s record with the opposite sex that seemingly has the tacit approval of Hillary? Maybe so if the recent reports that The Donald is alleged to have kissed and groped women without permission stand up.

But a lot of that has come to light as part of an election campaign that publicizes some glamourous women who recently reported their victimhood at the hands and whatever of The Donald. What does that say about those who are left out? That’s not to say they are lying. It can be awkward and uncomfortable to just scream “masher” (or the modern equivalent) when an uninvited meandering male hand touches the wrong female spot.

Both the Clintons and The Donald have personal charitable foundations and there is plenty of obliqueness about them. Certainly they’re created for tax advantages and the Clinton version is subjected to criticism for its help allegedly given to the poor in Haiti. The Donald’s charitable activities are likely subject to equal criticism. Get rich enough and you, too, can have a charitable foundation that shines a glowing light on you and provides other niceties that being rich can reap.

This isn’t to say that such charities and their founders are unworthy of praise for doing good works.

I came to Toronto by choice in 1971 after a journalism career in sunny Honolulu, Miami and Palm Beach. I was to start as a feature writer in the Toronto Telegram on Nov. 1 of that year. To my dismay, on Oct. 30, millionaire John Bassett sold the Tely’s “subscription list” to the Toronto Star (“I hate those guys,” he once confided to me when I worked at CFTO-TV) and I was unemployed in my new country.

Thankfully The Star had pity on me and arranged for me to become the overnight editor at the Oakville Daily Journal Record, an 8,000-circulation 5-day-a-week broadsheet printed on an antique press on Reynolds Street largely as an ego-boost to one of the ruling Star ownership families who lived on the lake in Oakville.

DJR had been a Thomson newspaper before The Star bought it through its Metroland subsidiary and the secretary in the ground-floor office had been trained by that creepy, tightfisted Thomson outfit. This being before computerized typesetting was standard at newspapers, I asked the secretary for some copy pencils on my first day in the employ of what its small staff unlovingly called the “Daily Urinal Record.” She handed me a single unsharpened thick red pencil.

I explained that I’d need more than one copy pencil since I was the final editor to handle copy before it was typeset. She explained that when I returned to her the stub of this one in an appropriately tiny length, that she would issue a replacement.

I reached in her drawer and pulled out a handful of copy pencils as she blinked in amazement and chagrin. I later moved onto another Metroland paper, the Mississauga Times, before my supply ran out.

I am so grateful that I could become a Canadian. And never more so as I watch the U.S. election unravel.

— Frank Touby

About Bulletin Editor

One comment

  1. I feel propagation of opinions like yours have put us in this frightening position. I trust you have not degraded the recent appointments to mere differences of opinion! But to look at the Clinton – Trump comparison where you somehow equate her record with his preposterous collection of rhetoric and lies.
    How can you equate allegations by 4 women against a spouse to 12 or more allegations of women willing to go to court and supported by statements which are time consistent and confirmed by recorded bragging of the accused nominee himself?
    Or unproved allegations against an organization which has channeled so much support into important endeavours world wide with a organization which has been used to make donations credited as personal charity donations or to buy a personal painting? How do you ignore the 300 plus absolute lies in his public speeches over the past 18 months?
    I’ll stop now but I’m really afraid that this whitelash has put US democracy in real danger. When the republicans had the chance they made the house almost impervious to change.
    Will they now install vote suppression laws, remove more laws governing campaign contributions and establish a big money autocracy. What’s next- internment camps and gas chambers? We are no better than Germany before the holocaust.
    They were led down the garden path by bombastic speeches and appeals to persecuting all the others who have made our lives miserableThe Clinton’s nor the democrat party are perfect but to pretend the two candidates are equal is unpardonable!
    Look back,Gore won the popular vote. But a Republican Supreme Court stepped in and let this unrepresentative electoral college win.We can only dream of a world without the Iraq war and with climate change already moving backwards. What will we dream of in 4 years?
    If we had had a truly representative government and a fair Unrepressed vote? Maybe a none FBI interference vote would have given the democrats enough power to fix the health care system.
    If the rich had been taxed maybe inequality could have been reduced and their taxes been used on jobs and infrastructure.
    Maybe the Paris agreement could actually have started on saving the world? This which piece of dirt excuse does not work! A bit of research and common sense untarnished by interminably
    repeated lies and bullying has to come to a decision against racism,misogyny and other divisive, demeaning planks of the Trump campaign.
    A very concerned Canadian/American
    Kathy Carter